On 04/03/2011 04:09 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 04/03/2011 05:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/03/2011 12:59 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Hi Avi,
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Avi Kivity<avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Note that this is a development prototype for the time being:
there's no
>> networking support and no graphics support, amongst other missing
>> essentials.
>
> Mind posting a roadmap? I would put smp support near the top.
This sort of
> thing has to be designed in, otherwise you wind up with a big
lock like
> qemu.
What are the pain points with qemu at the moment?
It's an ugly gooball.
Because it solves a lot of very difficult problems.
You could drop all of the TCG support and it'd still be an ugly gooball.
Supporting lots of different emulated hardware devices, live
migration, tons of different types of networking and image formats,
etc., all adds up over time.
Sure, any succcesful project becomes an ugly gooball. It's almost a
compliment.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
