On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:32:24PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > It seems there is a misunderstanding. KVM-tool is quite far from been KVM > replacement (if ever). And what we're doing -- extremely tiny/small HV which > would help us to debug/test kernel code. If that's true, then perhaps the command-line invocation shouldn't be named "kvm"? The collision on the name of executable that claims that it will replace the kvm shipped in qemu seems to make the claim quite clearly that it's going to replace qemu's kvm in short order? - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html