On 03/11/11 09:17, Markus Armbruster wrote: > David Ahern <daahern@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On 03/11/11 08:39, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> erik.rull@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: >>> >>>> Hi David, >>>> >>>> I did a second iteration and it looked way better, maybe my first attempts >>>> were somehow buggy. >>>> >>>> First - please review your DPRINTF in the usb-ehci.c, there is a variable >>>> "dev" undefined in line 504/505 when enabling the debugging defines at the >>>> top of the file, the compiler complains there. >>>> >>>> I tested again with your hints, here my results: >>>> >>>> - using -device usb-host causes windows not to boot completely, using >>>> -usbdevice host:auto:*.* is fine! >>>> >>>> - using -usbdevice tablet is better than using -device usb-tablet >>> >>> Better inhowfar? >> >> As I recall the USB code is the ignored step-child in qemu; it was never >> properly/fully integrated into the qdev stuff. The paths appear to >> differ in how usb devices are handled. I for one have always stuck with >> the -usbdevice route. > > Please report any deficiencies so we can fix this. Erik reported a few above. David > > -usbdevice is around for backward compatibility only. There are already > cases where -device provides you more control than -usbdevice. This > feature gap will only grow. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
