David Ahern <daahern@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 03/11/11 08:39, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> erik.rull@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: >> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> I did a second iteration and it looked way better, maybe my first attempts >>> were somehow buggy. >>> >>> First - please review your DPRINTF in the usb-ehci.c, there is a variable >>> "dev" undefined in line 504/505 when enabling the debugging defines at the >>> top of the file, the compiler complains there. >>> >>> I tested again with your hints, here my results: >>> >>> - using -device usb-host causes windows not to boot completely, using >>> -usbdevice host:auto:*.* is fine! >>> >>> - using -usbdevice tablet is better than using -device usb-tablet >> >> Better inhowfar? > > As I recall the USB code is the ignored step-child in qemu; it was never > properly/fully integrated into the qdev stuff. The paths appear to > differ in how usb devices are handled. I for one have always stuck with > the -usbdevice route. Please report any deficiencies so we can fix this. -usbdevice is around for backward compatibility only. There are already cases where -device provides you more control than -usbdevice. This feature gap will only grow. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
