Re: USB EHCI patch for 0.14.0?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 03/11/11 08:39, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> erik.rull@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> 
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I did a second iteration and it looked way better, maybe my first attempts
>> were somehow buggy.
>>
>> First - please review your DPRINTF in the usb-ehci.c, there is a variable
>> "dev" undefined in line 504/505 when enabling the debugging defines at the
>> top of the file, the compiler complains there.
>>
>> I tested again with your hints, here my results:
>>
>> - using -device usb-host causes windows not to boot completely, using
>> -usbdevice host:auto:*.* is fine!
>>
>> - using -usbdevice tablet is better than using -device usb-tablet
> 
> Better inhowfar?

As I recall the USB code is the ignored step-child in qemu; it was never
properly/fully integrated into the qdev stuff. The paths appear to
differ in how usb devices are handled. I for one have always stuck with
the -usbdevice route.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux