On 2011-03-08 18:40, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/08/2011 07:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2011-03-08 18:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>> The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a >>>>> regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no? >>>> >>>> Can't follow. What do you mean? >>> >>> I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this test >>> definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu non-iothread. >>> What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm. > > That was Paolo's patchset which I tested, yes? I wasn't talking about > that in the call. > >> Are we talking about the failing Fedora installations? Or something else? > > Something else - 27f368604a3d27ca4d. I already thought so. But that is understood, fixed, and will be obsoleted by the merge. More interesting are open issues. Any news from that front? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
