Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/08/2011 07:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-03-08 18:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>  On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>   The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a
>>>   regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no?
>>
>>  Can't follow. What do you mean?
>
>  I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this test
>  definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu non-iothread.
>    What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm.

That was Paolo's patchset which I tested, yes? I wasn't talking about that in the call.

Are we talking about the failing Fedora installations? Or something else?

Something else - 27f368604a3d27ca4d.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux