On 12/03/2010 08:12 PM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:07:15PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > My first reaction is that it's not terribly important to account the > non-idle time in the guest because of the use-case for this model. Agreed ...but I was considering the larger user-base who may be surprised to see their VMs being reported as 100% hogs when they had left it idle.
The larger user base won't enable this option. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
