On 12/03/2010 07:33 PM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:29:06AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote: > That's what Marcelo's suggestion does w/out a fill thread. Are we willing to add that to KVM sources?
I'd rather avoid it.
I was working under the constraints of not modifying the kernel (especially avoid adding short term hacks that become unnecessary in longer run, in this case when kernel-based hard limits goes in).
Yes. Allowing the guest to execute HLT is fine, but adding scheduling smarts to kvm is something else.
-- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
