On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 07:39:39PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 11/24/2010 07:33 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> > >> But I don't see the point. If you look at my repository, there's > >The point is that C++ is ugly language. The short code Avi sent remind > >me perl (aka line noise). It is almost impossible to parse it into > >what code it actually does. Most symbols are there for C++ syntax not > >functionality. > > No. They're there for error handling. A C++ wrapper, doesn't add > any functionality, so you can say that all of the lines of codes do > nothing and are just syntax. But they do allow you to pair init and > uninit (in the constructor and destructor). When you use the > wrapper (as opposed to the bare C interface) you get the value by > not having to code long error handling sequences (with a high > probability of getting them wrong and never finding out in testing). > So how errors are handled there? By throwing exceptions? Sorry this is not error "handling". -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
