On 11/24/2010 06:12 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > Why would we specify a PIIX3 device based on a configuration file? > There is only one PIIX3 device in the world. I don't see a lot of > need to create arbitrary types of devices. > Why deny this flexibility from those who need it for modelling different HW?
The various components exist and can be reused.
Besides, as I said, PIIX3 is ISA bridge and this is what class should implement.
Isn't it an ISA bridge + a few ISA devices?
We have fw_cfg on ISA bus too which does not exits on real HW and we may want to have other devices. We should be able to add them without changing PIIX3 class.
fw_cfg should certainly not be a member of PIIX3. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
