Hi, Anthony, On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 11:39 +0800, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 11/07/2010 07:29 PM, Huang Ying wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 00:24 +0800, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > >> On 11/01/2010 03:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> > >>> On 11/01/2010 02:20 PM, Huang Ying wrote: > >>> > >>>> Yes. As general interface, it may not work so well, but as test > >>>> interface, it works quite well and useful. > >>>> > >>>> Do we have any mechanism to add a test only interface? > >>>> > >>> I'd like to see what Luiz/Markus think but definitely only a human > >>> monitor interface and probably prefix the command with a 'x-' prefix > >>> to indicate that it's not a supported interface. > >>> > >>> > >> Automated testing will want to use qmp. > >> > > Yes. The main usage of the interface is automated testing. > > > > That's precisely what the command should not be used for. > > You can't assume a gpa -> hva mapping is consistent in an external > application. If you want to implement an interface for testing, you > have to push more of the logic into QEMU to avoid the race. Yes. pfa2hva (should be renamed to gpa2hva) in the patch works not well in general cases, but it works well for our testing. So we do not want to make it a general interface, but a testing only interface. Maybe via putting it into a special name space like "x-". Do you agree? Best Regards, Huang Ying -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
