Re: [PATCH 1/2] S390: take a full byte as ext_param indicator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Avi Kivity wrote:
>  On 08/24/2010 03:14 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>> I have no strong opinion on that, but I think its more a matter of where
>> to put an interface description. A header file seems just the right
>> place.
>> I will let you (or Rusty) decide.
>
> First of all we need a virtio/s390 specification, like we have a
> virtio/pci spec.

Sure, go ahead and write one :). All the bits are open.
No seriously, I've wanted to write one for quite a while but this is not
the right patch set for this.

> Second, I agree it should be in an exported header file, even if qemu
> doesn't make use of it.  It's an interface and should be exported.

Hrm. *shrug* if you think it makes sense. I'm reasonably indifferent
either way, but I don't see value-add in it.


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux