On 07/24/10 17:04, Balachandar wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Actually i got better results when i downloaded qemu-kvm 0.12.4 from > sourceforge and ran it. Now virtio performs better than emaulated > e1000 with our own simple ping-pong latency tests. Previously i used > Debian squeeze kvm package and i got poor results for virtio. I used > vhost-net as described by the kvm > website.http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/VhostNet. This also seem to have > the same problems i faced with Debian kvm package. How are you guyz > using vhost? Is there any other way to use vhost? Ok thats good to hear. Sounds like the Debian package might be dodgy, or they just happened to snapshot at a bad time. For vhost I am not the expert, maybe someone else knows. Jes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
