Re: Virtio network performance poorer than emulated e1000

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/23/10 03:31, Balachandar wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Sridhar Samudrala
> I tried this one also but not much improvement. Actually i get a some
> improvement if i disabled the tx timeout timer in the virtio_net.h in
> qemu-kvm. I read that with vhost the data flow path differs from
> normal operation. So is the timeout applicable when we  use vhost
> also? Actually i dont see any improvement with vhost. I am just
> wondering what am i missing? The thing that worries me is that
> emulated nic offers much greater performance than virtio with vhost.
> So i feel i am doing something wrong but unable to find it.

Could you try measuring something meaningful instead of ping please?
netperf or some other benchmark?

Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux