On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 02:43:37AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Btw, what is that intel thing everyone is talking about? And why > > would the virtio core support vendor specific behavior like that? > > It's not a thing it's Zhu Lingshan :) intel is just one of the vendors > that implemented vdpa support and so Zhu Lingshan from intel is working > on vdpa and has also proposed virtio spec extensions for migration. > intel's driver is called ifcvf. vdpa composes all this stuff that is > added to vfio in userspace, so it's a different approach. Well, so let's call it virtio live migration instead of intel. And please work all together in the virtio committee that you have one way of communication between controlling and controlled functions. If one extension does it one way and the other a different way that's just creating a giant mess.