On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 06:43:32PM +0300, Yishai Hadas wrote: > > I suggest 3 but call it on the VF. commands will switch to PF > > internally as needed. For example, intel might be interested in exposing > > admin commands through a memory BAR of VF itself. > > > The driver who owns the VF is VFIO, it's not a VIRTIO one. And to loop back into my previous discussion: that's the fundamental problem here. If it is owned by the virtio subsystem, which just calls into vfio we would not have this problem, including the circular loops and exposed APIs.
