Re: Tracking KVM development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tracking git repositories and stable setups are mutually exclusive.  If you
> are interested in something stable I recommend staying with the distribution
> provided setup (and picking a distribution that has an emphasis on kvm).  If
> you want to track upstream, use qemu-kvm-0.12.x stable releases and
> kernel.org 2.6.x.y stable releases.  If you want to track git repositories,
> use qemu-kvm.git and kvm.git for the kernel and kvm.

Thanks Avi.

I will stay with the stable qemu-kvm releases and stable kernel.org
kernel releases from now on.

I've never heard of any KVM specific distributions. Are you aware of
any? My primary reason for going with Slackware, is because I already
know it. But if there are better choices for a KVM virtualization
host, then I'm willing to switch.

:o)
/Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux