On 03/21/2010 06:37 PM, Thomas Løcke wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Avi Kivity<avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tracking git repositories and stable setups are mutually exclusive. If you
are interested in something stable I recommend staying with the distribution
provided setup (and picking a distribution that has an emphasis on kvm). If
you want to track upstream, use qemu-kvm-0.12.x stable releases and
kernel.org 2.6.x.y stable releases. If you want to track git repositories,
use qemu-kvm.git and kvm.git for the kernel and kvm.
Thanks Avi.
I will stay with the stable qemu-kvm releases and stable kernel.org
kernel releases from now on.
I've never heard of any KVM specific distributions. Are you aware of
any? My primary reason for going with Slackware, is because I already
know it. But if there are better choices for a KVM virtualization
host, then I'm willing to switch.
The only kvm-specific distribution I know of is RHEV-H, but that's
probably not what you're looking for. I'm talking about distributions
that have an active kvm package maintainer, update the packages
regularly, have bug trackers that someone looks into, etc. At least
Fedora and Ubuntu do this, perhaps openSuSE as well (though the latter
has a stronger Xen emphasis).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
