Re: KVM usability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/09/2010 07:27 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Perhaps a json representation of things.  We already have the parser.


Please no :-)

We have a config format, QemuOpts ties nicely into it as does qdev. We just need to represent machine information via QemuOpts and tie -m to manipulating the memory assigned to a machine. IOW, instead of:

(machine_init)(ram_addr_t ram_size,
                        const char *boot_device,
                        const char *kernel_filename,
                        const char *kernel_cmdline,
                        const char *initrd_filename,
                        const char *cpu_model)

It should be:

(machine_init)(QemuOpts *opts);

Then we can have a [machine] section in the config where we describe all of these things.

Looks good.

One day we'll read VHDL descriptions of the device model from the machine config file and tcg them to host native code, and qemu will be pure infrastructure with zero details.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux