Re: KVM PMU virtualization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 16:54 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/26/2010 04:27 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 15:55 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >    
> >> That actually works on the Intel-only architectural pmu.  I'm beginning
> >> to like it more and more.
> >>      
> > Only for the arch defined events, all _7_ of them.
> >    
> 
> That's 7 more than what we support now, and 7 more than what we can 
> guarantee without it.

Again, what windows software uses only those 7? Does it pay to only have
access to those 7 or does it limit the usability to exactly the same
subset a paravirt interface would?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux