On 02/26/10 14:31, Ingo Molnar wrote:
You are missing two big things wrt. compatibility here:
1) The first upgrade overhead a one time overhead only.
2) Once a Linux guest has upgraded, it will work in the future, with _any_
future CPU - _without_ having to upgrade the guest!
Dont you see the advantage of that? You can instrument an old system on new
hardware, without having to upgrade that guest for the new CPU support.
That would only work if you are guaranteed to be able to emulate old
hardware on new hardware. Not going to be feasible, so then we are in a
real mess.
With the 'steal the PMU' messy approach the guest OS has to be upgraded to the
new CPU type all the time. Ad infinitum.
The way the Perfmon architecture is specified by Intel, that is what we
are stuck with. It's not going to be possible via software emulation to
count cache misses, unless you run it in a micro architecture emulator.
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
