Re: Discordant results between UnixBench and nBench

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/23/2009 02:55 PM, Matthieu Olivier wrote:

I can only see 4 cores in /proc/cpuinfo.
According the caract page, there is no hyperthreading.

->  http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=35130


In this case the plateau at 4 guests is perfectly understandable.

I also wonder why the host can still get more CPU ressources over 4
threads? I guess the purpose of both benchmarks is to overload the
CPU, so why they can't reach the max?

Probably a problem with the benchmark itself.

I suposed that the FPU was able to handle at least 2 operations the
same time, or maybe hyperthreading was included, but I can't check the
first part, and the second isn't true.

Or maybe current x86 processors can handel very well these old
benchmarks. I can't really say :/

No, you should see the same plateau as with kvm. The processor can't run two threads at once.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux