On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/23/2009 02:27 PM, Matthieu Olivier wrote: >> >> Ok, there is an excel file which contain some results. >> I'm not supposed to give so many informations, but I really need to >> understand what's the problem. >> >> > > This is strange. Is the machine hyperthreaded? > > Please supply full /proc/cpuinfo. > > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function > > I can only see 4 cores in /proc/cpuinfo. According the caract page, there is no hyperthreading. -> http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=35130 I also wonder why the host can still get more CPU ressources over 4 threads? I guess the purpose of both benchmarks is to overload the CPU, so why they can't reach the max? I suposed that the FPU was able to handle at least 2 operations the same time, or maybe hyperthreading was included, but I can't check the first part, and the second isn't true. Or maybe current x86 processors can handel very well these old benchmarks. I can't really say :/ -- Matthieu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
