Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 1/2] unify structs for GDT descriptors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+Aaron Lewis

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 9:53 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Use the same names and definitions (apart from the high base field)
> for GDT descriptors.  gdt_entry_t is for 8-byte entries and
> gdt_desc_entry_t is for when 64-bit tests should use a 16-byte
> entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  lib/x86/desc.c         | 16 ++++++----------
>  lib/x86/desc.h         | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  x86/svm_tests.c        | 12 ++++++------
>  x86/taskswitch.c       |  2 +-
>  x86/vmware_backdoors.c |  8 ++++----
>  5 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/x86/desc.c b/lib/x86/desc.c
> index e7378c1..3d38565 100644
> --- a/lib/x86/desc.c
> +++ b/lib/x86/desc.c
> @@ -285,17 +285,13 @@ void set_gdt_entry(int sel, u32 base,  u32 limit, u8 access, u8 gran)
>         int num = sel >> 3;
>
>         /* Setup the descriptor base address */
> -       gdt32[num].base_low = (base & 0xFFFF);
> -       gdt32[num].base_middle = (base >> 16) & 0xFF;
> -       gdt32[num].base_high = (base >> 24) & 0xFF;
> +       gdt32[num].base1 = (base & 0xFFFF);
> +       gdt32[num].base2 = (base >> 16) & 0xFF;
> +       gdt32[num].base3 = (base >> 24) & 0xFF;
>
> -       /* Setup the descriptor limits */
> -       gdt32[num].limit_low = (limit & 0xFFFF);
> -       gdt32[num].granularity = ((limit >> 16) & 0x0F);
> -
> -       /* Finally, set up the granularity and access flags */
> -       gdt32[num].granularity |= (gran & 0xF0);
> -       gdt32[num].access = access;
> +       /* Setup the descriptor limits, granularity and flags */
> +       gdt32[num].limit1 = (limit & 0xFFFF);
> +       gdt32[num].type_limit_flags = ((limit & 0xF0000) >> 8) | ((gran & 0xF0) << 8) | access;
>  }
>
>  void set_gdt_task_gate(u16 sel, u16 tss_sel)
> diff --git a/lib/x86/desc.h b/lib/x86/desc.h
> index a6ffb38..3aa1eca 100644
> --- a/lib/x86/desc.h
> +++ b/lib/x86/desc.h
> @@ -164,15 +164,28 @@ typedef struct {
>  } idt_entry_t;
>
>  typedef struct {
> -       u16 limit_low;
> -       u16 base_low;
> -       u8 base_middle;
> -       u8 access;
> -       u8 granularity;
> -       u8 base_high;
> -} gdt_entry_t;
> -
> -struct segment_desc64 {
> +       uint16_t limit1;
> +       uint16_t base1;
> +       uint8_t  base2;

These names are even more horrible than their predecessors. How about
something like:

limit_15_0
base_15_0
base_23_16

> +       union {
> +               uint16_t  type_limit_flags;      /* Type and limit flags */

/* Type, limit[19:16], and flags */

> +               struct {
> +                       uint16_t type:4;
> +                       uint16_t s:1;
> +                       uint16_t dpl:2;
> +                       uint16_t p:1;
> +                       uint16_t limit:4;

Perhaps limit_19_16?

> +                       uint16_t avl:1;
> +                       uint16_t l:1;
> +                       uint16_t db:1;
> +                       uint16_t g:1;
> +               } __attribute__((__packed__));
> +       } __attribute__((__packed__));
> +       uint8_t  base3;

base_31_24?

> +} __attribute__((__packed__)) gdt_entry_t;
> +

Why specify 'gdt'? Aren't ldt descriptors the same format?

> +#ifdef __x86_64__
> +typedef struct {
>         uint16_t limit1;
>         uint16_t base1;
>         uint8_t  base2;
> @@ -193,7 +206,10 @@ struct segment_desc64 {
>         uint8_t  base3;
>         uint32_t base4;
>         uint32_t zero;
> -} __attribute__((__packed__));
> +} __attribute__((__packed__)) gdt_desc_entry_t;
> +#else
> +typedef gdt_entry_t gdt_desc_entry_t;
> +#endif
>
>  #define DESC_BUSY ((uint64_t) 1 << 41)
>
> diff --git a/x86/svm_tests.c b/x86/svm_tests.c
> index afdd359..014fbbf 100644
> --- a/x86/svm_tests.c
> +++ b/x86/svm_tests.c
> @@ -1876,22 +1876,22 @@ static bool reg_corruption_check(struct svm_test *test)
>  static void get_tss_entry(void *data)
>  {
>      struct descriptor_table_ptr gdt;
> -    struct segment_desc64 *gdt_table;
> -    struct segment_desc64 *tss_entry;
> +    gdt_entry_t *gdt_table;
> +    gdt_entry_t *tss_entry;
>      u16 tr = 0;
>
>      sgdt(&gdt);
>      tr = str();
> -    gdt_table = (struct segment_desc64 *) gdt.base;
> -    tss_entry = &gdt_table[tr / sizeof(struct segment_desc64)];
> -    *((struct segment_desc64 **)data) = tss_entry;
> +    gdt_table = (gdt_entry_t *) gdt.base;
> +    tss_entry = &gdt_table[tr / sizeof(gdt_entry_t)];
> +    *((gdt_entry_t **)data) = tss_entry;
>  }
>
>  static int orig_cpu_count;
>
>  static void init_startup_prepare(struct svm_test *test)
>  {
> -    struct segment_desc64 *tss_entry;
> +    gdt_entry_t *tss_entry;
>      int i;
>
>      on_cpu(1, get_tss_entry, &tss_entry);
> diff --git a/x86/taskswitch.c b/x86/taskswitch.c
> index 889831e..b6b3451 100644
> --- a/x86/taskswitch.c
> +++ b/x86/taskswitch.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ fault_handler(unsigned long error_code)
>
>         tss.eip += 2;
>
> -       gdt32[TSS_MAIN / 8].access &= ~2;
> +       gdt32[TSS_MAIN / 8].type &= ~2;

Is this right? I got the impression that there was one TSS descriptor per CPU.

>
>         set_gdt_task_gate(TSS_RETURN, tss_intr.prev);
>  }
> diff --git a/x86/vmware_backdoors.c b/x86/vmware_backdoors.c
> index b4902a9..24870d7 100644
> --- a/x86/vmware_backdoors.c
> +++ b/x86/vmware_backdoors.c
> @@ -133,8 +133,8 @@ struct fault_test vmware_backdoor_tests[] = {
>  static void set_tss_ioperm(void)
>  {
>         struct descriptor_table_ptr gdt;
> -       struct segment_desc64 *gdt_table;
> -       struct segment_desc64 *tss_entry;
> +       gdt_entry_t *gdt_table;
> +       gdt_desc_entry_t *tss_entry;
>         u16 tr = 0;
>         tss64_t *tss;
>         unsigned char *ioperm_bitmap;
> @@ -142,8 +142,8 @@ static void set_tss_ioperm(void)
>
>         sgdt(&gdt);
>         tr = str();
> -       gdt_table = (struct segment_desc64 *) gdt.base;
> -       tss_entry = &gdt_table[tr / sizeof(struct segment_desc64)];
> +       gdt_table = (gdt_entry_t *) gdt.base;
> +       tss_entry = (gdt_desc_entry_t *) &gdt_table[tr / sizeof(gdt_entry_t)];
>         tss_base = ((uint64_t) tss_entry->base1 |
>                         ((uint64_t) tss_entry->base2 << 16) |
>                         ((uint64_t) tss_entry->base3 << 24) |

It seems like there should be a library function for reconstructing a
base address from a segment descriptor.

> --
> 2.27.0
>
>



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux