On Wed, Oct 20, 2021, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: > On 20.10.2021 00:07, Sean Christopherson wrote: > I have always used the chronological order but your argument about > reviewers being able to quickly see the delta makes sense - will switch > to having the latest changes on the top in the next version. > > By the way, looking at the current https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ at the > time I am writing this, while most of v3+ submissions are indeed > using the "latest on the top" order, some aren't: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210813145302.3933-1-kevin3.tang@xxxxxxxxx/T/ > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211015024658.1353987-1-xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/ > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YW%2Fq70dLyF+YudyF@T590/T/ (this one uses a > hybrid approach - current version changes on the top, remaining changeset > in chronological order). Some people are heathens that have yet to be enlightened. Rest assured I'll do plenty of prosthelytizing should they ever post to arch/x86/kvm ;-)
