Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 05:53:56PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I would be much more inclined to consider
taking raw and improving the performance long term if guest<->host
networking worked. This appears to be a fundamental limitation though
and I think it's something that will forever plague users if we include
this feature.
In fact, I think it's fixable with a raw socket bound to a macvlan.
Would that be enough?
What setup does that entail on the part of a user? Wouldn't we be back
to square one wrt users having to run archaic networking commands in
order to set things up?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html