Re: Raw vs. tap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 05:53:56PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I would be much more inclined to consider taking raw and improving the performance long term if guest<->host networking worked. This appears to be a fundamental limitation though and I think it's something that will forever plague users if we include this feature.

In fact, I think it's fixable with a raw socket bound to a macvlan.
Would that be enough?

What setup does that entail on the part of a user? Wouldn't we be back to square one wrt users having to run archaic networking commands in order to set things up?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux