Re: Raw vs. tap (was: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Release plan for 0.12.0)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 05:53:56PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I would be much more inclined to consider  
> taking raw and improving the performance long term if guest<->host  
> networking worked.  This appears to be a fundamental limitation though  
> and I think it's something that will forever plague users if we include  
> this feature.

In fact, I think it's fixable with a raw socket bound to a macvlan.
Would that be enough?

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux