Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe, On 12/4/20 11:23 AM, Auger Eric wrote: > Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe, > > On 12/4/20 11:20 AM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: >> Hi Jean, >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx] >>> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54 >>> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Auger Eric <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>; wangxingang >>> <wangxingang5@xxxxxxxxxx>; Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@xxxxxxxxxx>; >>> kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; maz@xxxxxxxxxx; joro@xxxxxxxxxx; will@xxxxxxxxxx; >>> iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >>> vivek.gautam@xxxxxxx; alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx; >>> zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxx; robin.murphy@xxxxxxx; >>> kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; eric.auger.pro@xxxxxxxxx; Zengtao (B) >>> <prime.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; qubingbing <qubingbing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with >>> unmanaged ASIDs >>> >>> Hi Shameer, >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: >>>> Hi Jean/zhangfei, >>>> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related >>> patches >>>> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin of >>> Eric's series? >>>> Please share your thoughts. >>> >>> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches >>> based on mainline? >> >> Yes. >> >> The uacce-devel branches from >>> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment >>> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch >>> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.) As I plan to respin shortly, please could you confirm the best branch to rebase on still is that one (uacce-devel from the linux-kernel-uadk git repo). Is it up to date? Commits seem to be quite old there. Thanks Eric >> >> Thanks. >> >> Hi Eric, >> >> Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make sense >> to rebase on top of either of those? >> >> From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that. > > Sure. I will rebase on top of this ;-) > > Thanks > > Eric >> >> Thanks, >> Shameer >> >>> Thanks, >>> Jean >> > > _______________________________________________ > iommu mailing list > iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu >
