Hi Jean, > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54 > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Auger Eric <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>; wangxingang > <wangxingang5@xxxxxxxxxx>; Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@xxxxxxxxxx>; > kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; maz@xxxxxxxxxx; joro@xxxxxxxxxx; will@xxxxxxxxxx; > iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > vivek.gautam@xxxxxxx; alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx; > zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxx; robin.murphy@xxxxxxx; > kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; eric.auger.pro@xxxxxxxxx; Zengtao (B) > <prime.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; qubingbing <qubingbing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with > unmanaged ASIDs > > Hi Shameer, > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > > Hi Jean/zhangfei, > > Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related > patches > > that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin of > Eric's series? > > Please share your thoughts. > > By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches > based on mainline? Yes. The uacce-devel branches from > https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment > (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch > https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.) Thanks. Hi Eric, Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make sense to rebase on top of either of those? >From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that. Thanks, Shameer > Thanks, > Jean
