On 29/09/2020 10.49, Janosch Frank wrote: > On 9/29/20 10:38 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 28/09/20 19:49, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> Hi Paolo, >>> >>> the following changes since commit 58c94d57a51a6927a68e3f09627b2d85e3404c0f: >>> >>> travis.yml: Use TRAVIS_BUILD_DIR to refer to the top directory (2020-09-25 10:00:36 +0200) >>> >>> are available in the Git repository at: >>> >>> https://gitlab.com/huth/kvm-unit-tests.git tags/pull-request-2020-09-28 >>> >>> for you to fetch changes up to b508e1147055255ecce93a95916363bda8c8f299: >>> >>> scripts/arch-run: use ncat rather than nc. (2020-09-28 15:03:50 +0200) >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - s390x protected VM support >>> - Some other small s390x improvements >>> - Generic improvements in the scripts (better TAP13 names, nc -> ncat, ...) >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Jamie Iles (1): >>> scripts/arch-run: use ncat rather than nc. >>> >>> Marc Hartmayer (6): >>> runtime.bash: remove outdated comment >>> Use same test names in the default and the TAP13 output format >>> common.bash: run `cmd` only if a test case was found >>> scripts: add support for architecture dependent functions >>> run_tests/mkstandalone: add arch_cmd hook >>> s390x: add Protected VM support >>> >>> Thomas Huth (4): >>> configure: Add a check for the bash version >>> travis.yml: Update from Bionic to Focal >>> travis.yml: Update the list of s390x tests >>> s390x/selftest: Fix constraint of inline assembly >>> >>> .travis.yml | 7 ++++--- >>> README.md | 3 ++- >>> configure | 14 ++++++++++++++ >>> run_tests.sh | 18 +++++++++--------- >>> s390x/Makefile | 15 ++++++++++++++- >>> s390x/selftest.c | 2 +- >>> s390x/selftest.parmfile | 1 + >>> s390x/unittests.cfg | 1 + >>> scripts/arch-run.bash | 6 +++--- >>> scripts/common.bash | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- >>> scripts/mkstandalone.sh | 4 ---- >>> scripts/runtime.bash | 9 +++------ >>> scripts/s390x/func.bash | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 13 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 s390x/selftest.parmfile >>> create mode 100644 scripts/s390x/func.bash >>> >> >> Pulled, thanks (for now to my clone; waiting for CI to complete). >> Should we switch to Gitlab merge requests for pull requests only (i.e. >> patches still go on the mailing list)? >> >> Paolo >> > > Hrm, that would force everyone to use Gitlab and I see some value in > having pull request mails on the lists. You just opened the Pandora's > box of discussions :-) > > If it's easier for you I'd be open to open a marge request and send out > pull mails at the same time so people can comment without login to Gitlab. ... or maybe the people who already have a gitlab account could simply include the URL to their CI run in their pull request cover letter...? Thomas
