On 9/29/20 10:38 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 28/09/20 19:49, Thomas Huth wrote: >> Hi Paolo, >> >> the following changes since commit 58c94d57a51a6927a68e3f09627b2d85e3404c0f: >> >> travis.yml: Use TRAVIS_BUILD_DIR to refer to the top directory (2020-09-25 10:00:36 +0200) >> >> are available in the Git repository at: >> >> https://gitlab.com/huth/kvm-unit-tests.git tags/pull-request-2020-09-28 >> >> for you to fetch changes up to b508e1147055255ecce93a95916363bda8c8f299: >> >> scripts/arch-run: use ncat rather than nc. (2020-09-28 15:03:50 +0200) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> - s390x protected VM support >> - Some other small s390x improvements >> - Generic improvements in the scripts (better TAP13 names, nc -> ncat, ...) >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Jamie Iles (1): >> scripts/arch-run: use ncat rather than nc. >> >> Marc Hartmayer (6): >> runtime.bash: remove outdated comment >> Use same test names in the default and the TAP13 output format >> common.bash: run `cmd` only if a test case was found >> scripts: add support for architecture dependent functions >> run_tests/mkstandalone: add arch_cmd hook >> s390x: add Protected VM support >> >> Thomas Huth (4): >> configure: Add a check for the bash version >> travis.yml: Update from Bionic to Focal >> travis.yml: Update the list of s390x tests >> s390x/selftest: Fix constraint of inline assembly >> >> .travis.yml | 7 ++++--- >> README.md | 3 ++- >> configure | 14 ++++++++++++++ >> run_tests.sh | 18 +++++++++--------- >> s390x/Makefile | 15 ++++++++++++++- >> s390x/selftest.c | 2 +- >> s390x/selftest.parmfile | 1 + >> s390x/unittests.cfg | 1 + >> scripts/arch-run.bash | 6 +++--- >> scripts/common.bash | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- >> scripts/mkstandalone.sh | 4 ---- >> scripts/runtime.bash | 9 +++------ >> scripts/s390x/func.bash | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 13 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 s390x/selftest.parmfile >> create mode 100644 scripts/s390x/func.bash >> > > Pulled, thanks (for now to my clone; waiting for CI to complete). > Should we switch to Gitlab merge requests for pull requests only (i.e. > patches still go on the mailing list)? > > Paolo > Hrm, that would force everyone to use Gitlab and I see some value in having pull request mails on the lists. You just opened the Pandora's box of discussions :-) If it's easier for you I'd be open to open a marge request and send out pull mails at the same time so people can comment without login to Gitlab.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
