On 28/09/20 19:49, Thomas Huth wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > the following changes since commit 58c94d57a51a6927a68e3f09627b2d85e3404c0f: > > travis.yml: Use TRAVIS_BUILD_DIR to refer to the top directory (2020-09-25 10:00:36 +0200) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://gitlab.com/huth/kvm-unit-tests.git tags/pull-request-2020-09-28 > > for you to fetch changes up to b508e1147055255ecce93a95916363bda8c8f299: > > scripts/arch-run: use ncat rather than nc. (2020-09-28 15:03:50 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > - s390x protected VM support > - Some other small s390x improvements > - Generic improvements in the scripts (better TAP13 names, nc -> ncat, ...) > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Jamie Iles (1): > scripts/arch-run: use ncat rather than nc. > > Marc Hartmayer (6): > runtime.bash: remove outdated comment > Use same test names in the default and the TAP13 output format > common.bash: run `cmd` only if a test case was found > scripts: add support for architecture dependent functions > run_tests/mkstandalone: add arch_cmd hook > s390x: add Protected VM support > > Thomas Huth (4): > configure: Add a check for the bash version > travis.yml: Update from Bionic to Focal > travis.yml: Update the list of s390x tests > s390x/selftest: Fix constraint of inline assembly > > .travis.yml | 7 ++++--- > README.md | 3 ++- > configure | 14 ++++++++++++++ > run_tests.sh | 18 +++++++++--------- > s390x/Makefile | 15 ++++++++++++++- > s390x/selftest.c | 2 +- > s390x/selftest.parmfile | 1 + > s390x/unittests.cfg | 1 + > scripts/arch-run.bash | 6 +++--- > scripts/common.bash | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- > scripts/mkstandalone.sh | 4 ---- > scripts/runtime.bash | 9 +++------ > scripts/s390x/func.bash | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 13 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 s390x/selftest.parmfile > create mode 100644 scripts/s390x/func.bash > Pulled, thanks (for now to my clone; waiting for CI to complete). Should we switch to Gitlab merge requests for pull requests only (i.e. patches still go on the mailing list)? Paolo
