On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 08:56:06AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 22/09/20 08:45, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >> It's certainly a good idea but it's quite verbose. > >> > >> What about using atomic__* as the prefix? It is not very common in QEMU > >> but there are some cases (and I cannot think of anything better). > > > > aqomic_*, lol :) > > Actually qatomic_ would be a good one, wouldn't it? Yes, I think just adding a 'q' on the front of methods is more than sufficient (see also all the qcrypto_*, qio_* APIs I wrote). The only think a plain 'q' prefix is likely to clash with is the Qt library and that isn't something we're likely to link with (famous last words...). Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
