Re: A new name for kvm-unit-tests ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Jul 30, 2020, at 10:35 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 30/07/20 19:32, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> We can use compile-time or run-time logic that depends on the target to
>>> decide whether a test should be a normal test (pass/fail) or an
>>> xpass/xfail test.
>> This is simple. When I find some time, I will send some patches for that.
> 
> Not too quick, let's first look at a design.

Don’t worry, I am busy ;-)

The subtext of my response was that a fully fledged errata mechanism is more
complicated.





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux