On 30/07/20 09:13, Wanpeng Li wrote: >>> I personally dislike renames as you will have old references lurking in >>> the internet for decades. A rename will result in people continue to using >>> the old code because the old name is the only thing that they know. >> >> +1 for keeping the old name. >> >> cpu-unit-tests might also not be completely fitting (I remember we >> already do test, or will test in the future I/O stuff like PCI, CCW, ...). >> >> IMHO, It's much more a collection of tests to verify >> architecture/standard/whatever compliance (including paravirtualized >> interfaces if available). Good point. > Vote for keeping the old name. Ok, so either old name or alternatively arch-unit-tests? But the majority seems to be for kvm-unit-tests, and if Nadav has no trouble contributing to them I suppose everyone else can too. Paolo
