On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 15:10, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 30.07.20 08:38, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > > > On 30.07.20 07:41, Thomas Huth wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> since Paolo recently suggested to decrease the bus factor for > >> kvm-unit-tests [1], I suggested (in a private mail) to maybe also move > >> the repo to one of the git forges where we could benefit from a CI > > > > ack. > > > >> system (so that we do not merge bugs so often anymore as it happened in > >> the previous months). If we do that step, that might be a good point in > >> time to rename the kvm-unit-tests to something more adequate. "Why?" you > >> might ask ... well, the unit tests are not only useful for kvm anymore: > > > > I personally dislike renames as you will have old references lurking in > > the internet for decades. A rename will result in people continue to using > > the old code because the old name is the only thing that they know. > > > > [...] > >> Maybe we should come up with a more fancy name for the test suite? For > >> example something like "HECATE" - "*H*ypervisor *E*xecution and *C*pu > >> instruction *A*dvanced *T*est *E*nvironment" (and Hecate is also the > >> goddess of boundaries - which you could translate to the hypervisor > >> being the boundary between the virtual and real machine ... with a > >> little bit of imagination, of course) ... well, yeah, that's just what > >> came to my mind so far, of course. Let's brainstorm ... do you have any > >> good ideas for a new name of the kvm-unit-tests? Or do you love the old > >> name and think it should stay? Or do you think cpu-unit-tests would be > >> the best fit? Please let us know! > > > > If we rename than hecate or cpu-unit-tests is fine for me, but I prefer > > to keep the old name. > > +1 for keeping the old name. > > cpu-unit-tests might also not be completely fitting (I remember we > already do test, or will test in the future I/O stuff like PCI, CCW, ...). > > IMHO, It's much more a collection of tests to verify > architecture/standard/whatever compliance (including paravirtualized > interfaces if available). Vote for keeping the old name. Wanpeng