On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 04:12:28PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 24/02/20 23:08, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >> +
> >> +static __always_inline bool kvm_cpu_cap_has(unsigned x86_feature)
> >> +{
> >> + return kvm_cpu_cap_get(x86_feature);
> >> +}
> > I know this works (and I even checked C99 to make sure that it works not
> > by accident) but I have to admit that explicit '!!' conversion to bool
> > always makes me feel safer :-)
>
> Same here, I don't really like the automagic bool behavior...
Sounds like I need to add '!!'?
