On 25/02/20 22:22, Sean Christopherson wrote: >>> I know this works (and I even checked C99 to make sure that it works not >>> by accident) but I have to admit that explicit '!!' conversion to bool >>> always makes me feel safer :-) >> Same here, I don't really like the automagic bool behavior... > Sounds like I need to add '!!'? > Either that or "!= 0", as you prefer. Paolo
