I'll send a patch in this direction. Thanks, Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 18:51, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > On 19/02/20 17:53, Erwan Velu wrote: > > > > > > I've been testing the ratelimited which is far better but still prints > > 12 messages. > > 12 is already much better than 256. Someone else will have an even > bigger system requiring a larger delay, so I'd go with the default. > > Paolo > > > I saw the ratelimit is on about 5 sec, I wonder if we can explicit a > > longer one for this one. > > > > I searched around this but it doesn't seems that hacking the delay is a > > common usage. > > > > Do you have any insights/ideas around that ? > > > > > > Switching to ratelimit could be done by replacing the actual call or add > > a macro similar to kvm_pr_unimpl() so it can be reused easily. >
