On 19/02/20 17:53, Erwan Velu wrote: > > > I've been testing the ratelimited which is far better but still prints > 12 messages. 12 is already much better than 256. Someone else will have an even bigger system requiring a larger delay, so I'd go with the default. Paolo > I saw the ratelimit is on about 5 sec, I wonder if we can explicit a > longer one for this one. > > I searched around this but it doesn't seems that hacking the delay is a > common usage. > > Do you have any insights/ideas around that ? > > > Switching to ratelimit could be done by replacing the actual call or add > a macro similar to kvm_pr_unimpl() so it can be reused easily.
