答复: 答复: [PATCH][V2] KVM: svm: merge incomplete IPI emulation handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: kvm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:kvm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 代
> 表 Borislav Petkov
> 发送时间: 2019年3月18日 16:10
> 收件人: Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>
> 抄送: x86@xxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx;
> sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx
> 主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH][V2] KVM: svm: merge incomplete IPI emulation
> handling
> 
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 07:53:24AM +0000, Li,Rongqing wrote:
> > Do you means I should add sign-off-by: Sean Christopherson?
> > Should I send V3? or Is it oK with the below ?
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > -RongQing
> >
> >
> > > in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for details.
> 
> No, read this doc to understand first that sprinkling SOBs is not what we do and
> those things have meaning.
> 


Read, but no clear where are wrong

-RongQing

> --
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux