> -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: kvm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:kvm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 代 > 表 Borislav Petkov > 发送时间: 2019年3月18日 15:03 > 收件人: Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx> > 抄送: x86@xxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; > sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx > 主题: Re: [PATCH][V2] KVM: svm: merge incomplete IPI emulation handling > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 08:56:53AM +0800, Li RongQing wrote: > > Invalid int type emulation and target not running emulation have same > > codes, which update APIC ICR high/low registers, and emulate sending > > the IPI. > > > > so fall through this switch cases to reduce duplicate codes and wide > > the comment out to 80 columns > > > > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yu <zhangyu31@xxxxxxxxx> > > This SOB chain is wrong. See > > 11) Sign your work - the Developer's Certificate of Origin > Do you means I should add sign-off-by: Sean Christopherson? Should I send V3? or Is it oK with the below ? Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> -RongQing > in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for details. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
