Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 17/12/18 11:30, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >>> Queued, thanks. I moved this above the direct EOI series so that >>> KVM_CAP_HYPERV_STIMER_DIRECT need not exist at any point of the history. >>> >> Thanks! Just to make sure (and to conclude our discussion with Roman): >> with your Qemu maintainer hat on, do you agree with the design decision >> that KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID's output value changes when >> KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS gets enabled? This differs from >> KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID (where we always list all feature bits even if >> they require explicit enablement)? > > It doesn't really matter, since the old capability cannot be removed. > If you want to change it with a patch on top, that's also okay with me. Ok, let's leave it as it is: maybe some other userspace (which doesn't use legacy capabilities) will be grateful :-) -- Vitaly
