Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Queued, thanks. I moved this above the direct EOI series so that > KVM_CAP_HYPERV_STIMER_DIRECT need not exist at any point of the history. > Thanks! Just to make sure (and to conclude our discussion with Roman): with your Qemu maintainer hat on, do you agree with the design decision that KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID's output value changes when KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS gets enabled? This differs from KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID (where we always list all feature bits even if they require explicit enablement)? -- Vitaly