On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 11:02:35AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:21 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > it seems that it depends on current not on the active mm. > > Yes, see my other suggestion to just fix "use_mm()" to update the address range. > > Would you mind testing that? Sure, I'll test it. > Because that would seem to be the *much* less error-prone model.. > > Linus I agree, it's always been bothering me. -- MST
