On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 4:00 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > + memset(&rsp, 0, sizeof(rsp)); > + rsp.response = VIRTIO_SCSI_S_FUNCTION_REJECTED; > + resp = vq->iov[out].iov_base; > + ret = __copy_to_user(resp, &rsp, sizeof(rsp)); > > Is it actually safe to trust that iov_base has passed an earlier > access_ok() check here? Why not just use copy_to_user() instead? Good point. We really should have removed those double-underscore things ages ago. Also, apart from the address, what about the size? Wouldn't it be better to use copy_to_iter() rather than implement it badly by hand? Linus