On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:10 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Don't you take over the VM with "use_mm()" when you do the copies? So
> yes, it's a kernel thread, but it has a user VM, and though that
> should have the user limits.
Oooh. *Just* as I sent this, I realized that "use_mm()" doesn't update
the thread addr_limit.
That actually looks like a bug to me - although one that you've
apparently been aware of and worked around.
Wouldn't it be nicer to just make "use_mm()" do
set_fs(USER_DS);
instead? And undo it on unuse_mm()?
And, in fact, maybe we should default kernel threads to have a zero
address limit, so that they can't do any user accesses at all without
doing this?
Adding Al to the cc, because I think he's been looking at set_fs() in general.
Linus
