On 06/03/2018 22:03, Radim Krcmar wrote: >> /* Fam 15h MSRs */ >> #define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL 0xc0010200 >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0 MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL1 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 2) >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL2 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 4) >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL3 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 6) >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL4 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 8) >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL5 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 10) >> + >> #define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR 0xc0010201 >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR0 MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR1 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 2) >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR2 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 4) >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR3 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 6) >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR4 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 8) >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR5 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 10) >> + > x86 maintainers, > > are you ok with this going through the kvm tree? Boris, can you ack these new MSRs? Thanks, Paolo