On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 06/03/2018 22:03, Radim Krcmar wrote: > >> /* Fam 15h MSRs */ > >> #define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL 0xc0010200 > >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0 MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL > >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL1 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 2) > >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL2 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 4) > >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL3 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 6) > >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL4 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 8) > >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL5 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 10) > >> + > >> #define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR 0xc0010201 > >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR0 MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR > >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR1 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 2) > >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR2 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 4) > >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR3 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 6) > >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR4 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 8) > >> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR5 (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 10) > >> + > > x86 maintainers, > > > > are you ok with this going through the kvm tree? yes. Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
